Movies

It seems fitting that the title of the new X-Men movie includes the word “phoenix,” because for its director, Simon Kinberg, the film represents both an ending and a new beginning.

“Dark Phoenix,” in theaters Friday, is the final installment in the mutant-superhero franchise produced by 20th Century Fox; it caps the end of an era for the series that began with 2000’s “X-Men” as it heads into uncharted territory under the stewardship of Disney, which acquired Fox earlier this year. For Kinberg, who has played a key role in steering the X-Men universe at Fox as a screenwriter and producer for more than a decade, the film also marks the launch of a new career as a director.

On a recent afternoon, Kinberg, 45, sat in a darkened edit bay near his office on the Fox lot, reflecting on his own days of future past with the franchise, which stretch back to 2006’s “X-Men: The Last Stand,” for which he co-wrote the script.

“When I started, I don’t think I anticipated what my role would become — I was just stoked to make an X-Men movie,” he said. “The first day I walked on the set and Wolverine was saying my lines, I was geeked out beyond imagination. I didn’t have any sense that I would become — whatever you want to call it — the architect of this franchise. It wasn’t a plan. It wasn’t by design.”

Planned or not, Kinberg’s journey with the franchise has taken him through nine films as a writer and producer, including both the main X-Men saga and spinoffs like “Logan,” “Deadpool” and the horror-inflected “The New Mutants,” slated for release next April. Now, having spent years as the largely unseen, behind-the-scenes Professor Xavier of the X-Men cinematic universe, he finds himself front and center in “Dark Phoenix,” which he both wrote and directed.

Set 10 years after the events of 2016’s “X-Men: Apocalypse,” “Dark Phoenix” recounts one of the most beloved storylines in the X-Men comic books. “Game of Thrones” alum Sophie Turner returns as Jean Grey, a mutant whose telepathic and telekinetic powers become augmented far beyond her ability to control them after she is bombarded by cosmic energy during a mission in space, transforming her into the destructive Dark Phoenix. As she cuts a path of destruction, the other X-Men feud over how to contain her power, while a malevolent alien (Jessica Chastain) tries to claim it for her own purposes.

A version of the Dark Phoenix story had actually been incorporated into “The Last Stand” but many fans found that abbreviated take unsatisfying. Having rebooted the X-Men timeline with the time-travel gambit of 2014’s “Days of Future Past,” Kinberg relished the idea of getting another crack at it.

“My biggest regret from ‘The Last Stand’ is that the Dark Phoenix story, which is the most enduring story in the history of this very esteemed saga, was given a back seat in the movie,” Kinberg said. “So when I reset the timeline, I was absolutely conscious that what that would allow us to do is tell the Dark Phoenix story again.”

When it became clear that “Apocalypse” director Bryan Singer — who has faced allegations of sexual misconduct, which he has denied — was not going to return to direct “Dark Phoenix,” the cast lobbied for Kinberg to take on the job. Jennifer Lawrence, who plays Raven, went so far as to say she would walk away from the film if he didn’t.

To assume the helm of any big-budget superhero film is a daunting proposition. To do so as a first-time director requires nerves of adamantium. But having worked on virtually every aspect of production both on the X-Men movies and on such non-superhero films as “Cinderella,” “Sherlock Holmes,” “The Martian” and “Murder on the Orient Express,” Kinberg felt ready.

“This was definitely a big first movie to take on,” said Kinberg. “But it felt like a pretty organic transition because as a writer and producer on these films, I’ve done a lot of directorial duties. The biggest thing was stamina. When you’re a writer-producer, you can take breaks and check your phone or Skype with your kids. When you’re directing, every time you say ‘cut’ there’s a line of 15 people that have questions.”

Producer Hutch Parker, who has worked with Kinberg on a number of films, says he took to directing as if he was born to do it. “On set, Simon was incredibly relaxed,” Parker said. “In some ways I think he found it more comfortable and less anxiety-provoking than being a writer-producer, where you’re inevitably having to hand over your work to someone else. Being both the writer and the director, there was an ease he felt that seemed to make him incredibly at home on set.”

Singer had originally been announced as a producer on “Dark Phoenix” but, in the wake of his being fired from Fox’s Freddie Mercury biopic “Bohemian Rhapsody,” he fell away from the project. Asked about Singer, Kinberg chose his words carefully.

“What happened in Bryan’s personal life and his behavior on and off set — especially off set — really isn’t for me to talk about,” he said. “He’s a very gifted filmmaker and he was very collaborative with me. But there’s no question that we live in a different culture now than five, 10, 20 years ago. For a long time, the culture of Hollywood has been very problematic in terms of allowing filmmakers especially to treat people terribly, to violate people, to cover up crimes. Now people are being held accountable for their actions. And that’s a great thing.”

The “Dark Phoenix” production was not without its challenges. Originally slated for release last November, the film underwent extensive reshoots, with Kinberg deciding to retool the film’s entire third act from a space-set battle to a more grounded, Earthbound climax.

“It was just a redo, really,” said James McAvoy, who plays Charles Xavier. “The [original] ending maybe wasn’t good enough, but I also know there was a massive crossover with what happened in another Marvel movie in terms of our chosen bad guy and how it all played out.” (This year’s “Captain Marvel” ended with a similar climactic showdown in space.)

Through it all, McAvoy says, Kinberg never lost his focus or his cool. “He was strangely calm and together,” said the actor. “I’ve worked with people who are vastly more experienced who don’t have the same level of temperance and ability to remain in charge of their faculties as he does.”

Then, during postproduction, stories began to circulate about Disney eyeing a takeover of Fox, putting the future of “Dark Phoenix” and other superhero projects Kinberg was developing, including “Gambit” and “X-Force,” in question.

With the X-Men and other Fox-owned superhero properties like Deadpool and Fantastic Four set to be absorbed into the Marvel Cinematic Universe under the stewardship of Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige, the future of those franchises is still unclear. For the moment, there are no X-Men films on Marvel’s release calendar beyond the repeatedly delayed “New Mutants” spinoff, and Marvel appears to be putting the characters on the back burner.

“I love the X-Men so I have lots of thoughts,” said Kinberg, who has been friends with Feige since “The Last Stand,” which Feige produced. “But I don’t know what the plans are going to be in terms of casting or storytelling. I don’t know that Marvel knows what the larger plan is. But I’m excited about it. I’m obviously a huge admirer of what they’ve done.”

As he brings this era of the X-Men to a close, Kinberg — whose next directing project, a female-led spy thriller called “355” starring Chastain and a cast of international stars, is set to begin production in July — is already looking ahead to a future without the mutants at its center.

“It’s ironic,” he said. “Three years ago there was no Disney takeover of Fox, but I treated this movie from the beginning like it was the culmination of the X-Men saga that we’ve been telling. They start as strangers, they become a family, they are ripped apart and ultimately come back together stronger. And it just so happens that it is.”

 

Dark Phoenix director Simon Kinberg revealed he thinks there’s one other X-Men movie plotline that should be redone. Kinberg, of course, is no stranger to redoing X-Men stories. The writer-director previously penned the script for X-Men: The Last Stand, which featured the Dark Phoenix story as a subplot rather than the main focus - a move that Kinberg later said he regretted. Dark Phoenix, which is Kinberg’s directing debut, is his chance to redress that.

For X-Men fans, Dark Phoenix is a monumental film in more ways than one. Not only does the movie mark the end of the X-Men prequel series that began back in 2011 with X-Men: First Class, it’s also the final 20th Century Fox X-Men movie since Disney’s recent acquisition of Fox assets means the mutant heroes are firmly back in the hands of Marvel. It’s the end of an era, but judging by Kinberg’s comments, there’s a certain story from that X-Men era that should be done better.

In an exclusive interview with Screen Rant, the director stated he’d like to see the Weapon X storyline redone in some way. Kinberg said:

I think the other storylines in the mainline X-Men movies were told well. I think, in terms of other X-Men films or the spin-offs, maybe the Weapon X story could be told again. Jim Mangold did such an extraordinary job with Logan and I loved it. I don't know how you would do it to like go backward, I don't think you could do it with Hugh, but I do think that there's something in the Weapon X story that would be cool to see.

For those in need of a recap, the Weapon X story arc focused on how Logan became Wolverine after he was kidnapped by the shady, titular government agency and subjected him to the adamantium bonding process - although the full history of Weapon X goes much deeper. Weapon X has of course already featured in X-Men spinoffs including Deadpool, Logan and X-Men Origins: Wolverine, although the less said about the latter the better. Weapon X also featured in mainline movies including X-Men: Apocalypse, but a movie with more of a focus on the government agency could be interesting.

As Kinberg points out, one major hurdle in any Weapon X story that might feature in a future film is the fact that Wolverine actor Hugh Jackman hung up his adamantium claws after filming Logan. Given that Weapon X is so intrinsically linked with the character of Wolverine, that presents a few problems, but that doesn’t mean a Weapon X movie couldn’t work without him. There are plenty of potential X-Men projects at Marvel Studios that could feature a Weapon X story and there’s always the likelihood that the character of Wolverine will be recast for the MCU, which could leave the door wide open for a movie that explores Wolverine and Weapon X more closely.

The real question is, if the Weapon X story is told again then who is the man or woman for the job? Perhaps the Dark Phoenix director is nominating himself.

The vast majority of kaiju movies suffer from the exact same, practically insurmountable problem; the human characters are incredibly dull, stealing valuable screen time away from their monstrous co-stars, the “Titans.”

This wouldn’t be a problem if the Titans were imbued with metaphorical undertones, but Godzilla: King Of The Monsters isn’t quite sure what the beasts really represent. Traditionally, kaiju tend to embody the apocalyptic threat of the A-bomb, their city-destroying conflicts exposing the hubris of man.

Peaceful Mothra embodied Japan, while King Ghidorah and Rodan were thought to represent the nuclear threat of China and the Soviet Union, respectively. As camp and corny as those ridiculous rubber-suited scraps were, they presented their kaiju as personifications of war, with tiny humans swept up in an epic catastrophe, beyond their understanding and control.

The beasts now echo the modern-day anxiety of climate change, but that environmentalist theme is inconsistent and confused, imbued with the horrors of war and terrorism, never quite managing to make a point.

The battle between Godzilla and the MUTO’s from Gareth Edwards’ 2014 Godzilla is re-examined in a harrowing flashback meant to echo a terrorist atrocity, the 9/11 of this universe, in much the same way that Batman v Superman viewed Superman’s battle with Zod.

In this story, terrorism and environmental activism are firmly entwined, the eco-activists proposing radical, murderous solutions, with the might of the military proving to be the real solution to humanity's problems.

On reflection, the underlying message of the story is deeply unpleasant; the pollution of the Earth is presented as a problem, but the real antagonist of the film is King Ghidorah, the foreign invader, revived by environmentalists and their short-sighted extremism. In order to take down the enemy, Godzilla requires a “power-up” from the army, in the form of a nuclear bomb.

The film depicts Earth as a crumbling hellscape, environmental activism as well-intended terrorism, but don’t worry - the military will always be there to bomb an alien invader into dust. That might be a hypercritical overanalysis of a movie in which two big lizards fight to the death, but without a strong metaphor, the kaijus have no place in pop culture beyond spectacle.

There’s a reason why the original Godzilla resonated so strongly, why the sentient A-bomb has persevered as an icon for so many decades. Without a semblance of meaning behind the beast’s apocalyptic battles, the emptiness of the human characters becomes a glaring issue, and the story fails to engage.

That being said, Godzilla: King Of The Monsters does provide some beautiful shots and epic battle scenes that would make any long-time kaiju enthusiastic ignore the flaws. The creature design is spectacular, especially King Ghidorah, a dragon more visually stunning than Daenerys Targaryen's triplets.

However, the film fails to highlight the sense of scale, the awe-inducing, godlike might of the monsters, favoring shaky close-ups that don’t do the wonderful creature designs justice.

Godzilla: King Of The Monsters has nothing interesting to say about the Titans, or the humans caught up in the chaos, but if you’re simply looking to see the classic kaiju redesigned, rendered in glorious CGI, you’ll likely be satisfied.

The tussle for power between giant monsters and humans is a timeless theme, tackled by the likes of Transformers, Jurassic Park and Pacific Rim franchises with varying degrees of success. The problem with Hollywood’s latest take, Michael Dougherty’s reimagining of the Japanese studio Toho’s famous kaiju series, is not its predictability, but its utter gracelessness.

The plot picks up after 2014’s Godzilla. A sonar device developed by Vera Farmiga’s Emma to control the monsters has been hijacked by an eco-terrorist; her ex-husband (Kyle Chandler) is drafted in to track it down.

Their teenage daughter (Millie Bobby Brown from Stranger Things) is a distraction, caught in the middle of her divorced parents. Battle scenes occur in weather conditions so extreme that the action is rendered indecipherable (as are the beloved giant creatures, including the three-headed serpent King Ghidorah, bird-like Rodan and winged Mothra).

The ugly visual effects are outdone only by the sound design, which is relentlessly loud and thunderingly tedious. Verbal exchanges between the humans are devoid of wit and barely functional in communicating the story.

… and laying the foundations for a sustainable future. Guardian journalism has now been supported by more than one million readers across the world – meaning we’ve been able to keep all our reporting open to everyone, and our editorial independence is protected. But we need to keep growing the number of readers who are investing in our future – by 2022, we aim to have two million supporters around the world.

The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.

Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can investigate with courage and report with honesty – giving a voice to those less heard, exploring where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.

The motion picture Breakthrough is the true story of a mother’s worst nightmare: the very real prospect of losing your own child.

In the movie, an accomplished and somewhat obsessed high school basketball-playing son goes off the slippery slope when away from his mother. He tragically falls through ice while playing with friends on a frozen lake. But that is not the only breakthrough that occurs in the movie.

In Breakthrough the story also revolves around a woman who lives with the regret of giving up her first-born son to adoption earlier in life. Now she is faced with the painful potential of the loss of her adopted son, who she loves.

Other breakthroughs involve the mother’s relationship with her husband and her pastor.

The movie has some lighter “icebreaker” scenes in addition to the main theme of a mother’s love for her son.

Breakthrough gives an honest and realistic portrayal of modern-day life in America. Imperfect people with relational conflicts between parent and child,, and teenage rebellion involving forgiveness.

As a faith-based movie, this real-life account is a gripping story of a modern-day miracle. Tragedy and inspiration both are on thin ice as this film is rated PG.

As a faith-based movie, this real-life account is a gripping story of a modern-day miracle. Tragedy and inspiration both are on thin ice as this film is rated PG.

The movie’s audience at the early Saturday evening showing, which I attended, watched, for the most part, in rapt attention. They seemed to enjoy the movie; I didn’t notice anyone leaving their seats during the movie.

Upon leaving the movie, we saw a long line waiting to enter the theater rooms showing the new Avengers movie. I couldn’t help but think that all these folks picked the wrong movie to view that night.

I would recommend Breakthrough for all audiences. Use discretion with small children as the tragic scenes depicted may be too dramatic for small viewers.

Greg Jevnikar is a healthcare professional and devoted Christ-follower. As a blogger and activist, he defends the sanctity of human life and traditional marriage .and participates in the Ohio Tea Party movement.

You can get comprehensive lists of everything coming to streaming services anywhere. But half of those titles you don’t care about, and the other half are terrible. Where’s the good stuff? io9 is here to help.

Below you’ll find what we deem to be the best sci-fi and fantasy movies and TV coming to Netflix, Amazon, and Hulu in June.

Netflix
Available June 1
A.I. Artificial Intelligence - Steven Spielberg’s completion of the late Stanley Kubrick’s vision remains one of Spielberg’s most underappreciated films.

Batman Begins and The Dark Knight - Ever seen these? I heard they’re pretty good. Oddly, no Dark Knight Rises though.

Carrie - Brian De Palma’s 1976 adaptation of Stephen King’s first published novel is still high-school horror at its very finest.

The Space Between Us - Here’s movie that’s not as good as it should be, but isn’t half bad. It’s about a boy who was born in space then comes to Earth to meet the girl he loves.

Available June 5
Black Mirror: Season 5 - Need we say more? Check out more coverage here.

Available June 7
I Am Mother - A hit at Sundance this year that was quickly swept up by Netflix, this film is about a young girl raised by a robot after the apocalypse who finds out the robot may not be telling the truth. We haven’t seen it yet, but are looking forward to it.

Available June 11
Ralph Breaks the Internet - The Wreck-It Ralph movies are weird. They’re both so good and yet I feel like no one ever talks about them. So if you missed the sequel, which is quite entertaining, here’s your chance to Netflix it.

Available June 21
Neon Genesis Evangelion, EVANGELION: DEATH (TRUE)², and The End of Evangelion - Get in the robot! One of the most influential anime series of all time and a pair of related movies will finally be available for streaming, making them easily accessible for both diehards and newcomers.

Available June 26
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse - If you haven’t seen it yet, what are you doing? We named it our best film of 2018! It’s that good. You have to see it now and then rewatch it every day.

An American Werewolf in London - No major sci-fi movies pop up until the end of the month on Amazon, but they it have some great ones—like this legendary 1981 werewolf movie that’s overdue to be loved by a new generation.

Minority Report - Another underappreciated Steven Spielberg film comes to streaming this month. This one is not as good as A.I. in my opinion, but still a great blend of sci-fi ideas, with a nice big dose of Tom Cruise action.

Mission: Impossible III - More Cruise, this time from a disciple of Spielberg, a young filmmaker by the name of J.J. Abrams. This was his first feature film...wonder if he’s done anything since.

Open Water and Open Water 2: Adrift - I love the super small, super intense Open Water, a story about a couple stranded in the shark-infested ocean. And though I haven’t seen the sequel, I’m sure it’s kind of okay to watch after the original if you so choose.

Sleepy Hollow - If you can get over the Johnny Depp-ness of it all, this Tim Burton adaptation has some great thrills, chills, and spills. Many of which come from a certain Headless Horseman.

Spaceballs - Here’s how good Spaceballs is. It’s the movie that, in a way, helped keep Star Wars afloat. Released right in that period when Star Wars was fading, a whole generation of kids learned about a galaxy far, far, away through this hilarious, perfect Mel Brooks parody.

Species, Species III, and Species: The Awakening - But no Species II. Odd. Anyway, I can’t vouch for the third or fourth one, but the first one was a favorite growing up.

The Silence of the Lambs - In our opinion, one of the great horror films of all-time and the rare film to sweep all four major Academy Awards. Enjoy it with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.

The Wraith - Every month there’s one movie I’m really excited is coming to streaming, mostly because I loved it as a young child and it has since kind of gotten lost in time. Well, this month, that movie is The Wraith, which is about a boy who comes back from the dead with a magic car. Or something like that. Anyway, I can’t wait.

Available June 1
The ’Burbs - Balancing creepy with funny is an art form and few do it better than Joe Dante, who helmed this classic 1980s film starring Tom Hanks and Carrie Fisher.

Dante’s Peak - Remember in 1997 when two volcano movies came out? One had Tommy Lee Jones and the other had Pierce Brosnan. This is one of the two. (Don’t worry, I can totally tell them apart. Seriously.)

Dragonheart and Dragonheart: A New Beginning- You say the words “Dennis Quaid” and “dragon” and we’re there. Plus, apparently, there was a sequel that didn’t quite star Dennis Quaid or make it to theaters. But, now the original and sequel are on Hulu.

Existenz - Jude Law and Jennifer Jason Leigh star in David Cronenberg’s weird mix of video games and horror and a bunch of other cool, gross shit cause it’s David Cronenberg.

Friday the 13th, Friday the 13th – Part II, Friday the 13th – Part III, Friday the 13th – Part IV: The Final Chapter, Friday the 13th – Part V: A New Beginning, Friday the 13th – Part VI: Jason Lives, Friday the 13th – Part VII: The New Blood, Friday the 13th – Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan - One through eight! All classics in their own right. And now, all on Hulu.

The Gift - Sam Raimi, Cate Blanchett, why haven’t you heard of this movie before? Well, probably because it’s only so-so. But, a Sam Raimi movie about a woman who tries to solve a murder through ESP? Come on, you know you want to check it out.

Independence Day - Smart. Get this one on the streaming service before July. You know everyone is going to watch it then. I usually do.

Mission: Impossible - It’s funny to look back at this Brian De Palma film and imagine it getting like seven sequels in the years that followed. Sure it’s good, but that good? You simply never know.

The People vs. George Lucas - A solid little doc about Star Wars fandom which also, in retrospect, makes you think “Yeah, I’d walk away for $4 billion.”

The Secret of NIMH - This film has definitely made its way to some other streaming services but now, it’s Hulu. And thinking of it will always make me remember how scared it made me as a kid.

Available June 4
District 9 - Neill Blomkamp’s awesome social sci-fi action film is always worth a watch, for its effects, weapons, smart storytelling, performances, and also to see what the filmmaker is capable of under the tutelage of a killer producer like Peter Jackson. (Also on Amazon.)

Available June 5
The Handmaid’s Tale: Season 3 Premiere - For me, this is the highlight of the month. Kick some ass, June.

 

The new film Hold the Dark -- which premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival and is now available on Netflix -- does not offer easy answers. In fact, it barely offers any answers. But even though you may wind up feeling a little perplexed as to what you just watched, director Jeremy Saulnier tells Thrillist that the movie is peppered with clues as to what's really going on in the surreal, violent, and snowy landscape.

Hold the Dark is a surreal mystery about a fictional remote Alaskan village, Keelut, beset by wolves that are apparently taking children. One such child is Bailey, the son of Medora Stone (Riley Keough). Stone asks writer and researcher Russell Core (Jeffrey Wright) to come and find the creature responsible, but soon after Core arrives he discovers a much different scenario. Medora actually murdered her son. Core finds the body wrapped up in her basement, and Medora has disappeared.

Meanwhile, her husband Vernon (Alexander Skarsgård) is returning from war to find his kid dead and his wife missing, which sends him on a bloody hunt. There's certainly something strange about their relationship, but it's unclear what, exactly, and this uncertainty becomes one of the central themes propelling the plot.

"Once I committed to the project, it was cathartic and positive for me in that it helped me deal with the frustrations of trying to every day figure out what the fuck we're doing to each other, why humans behave the way they do, why we're so inherently violent and tribal and sort of act counter to our best interests," Saulnier says.

The film is based on a novel by William Giraldi, which gets a little more explicit as the plot unravels and the bodies pile up. Though the connection between Medora and Vernon, two Nordic-looking people who stand out amid the largely indigenous population of Keelut, isn't defined on screen, it is in the text. They're twins, which obviously makes the fact that they live as husband and wife a bit strange, to say the least. And while Saulnier's film doesn't really assign a motive to Medora's infanticide, Giraldi's work describes her emotions surrounding the birth of Bailey. In one portion it reads, "The first day she was alone with her child she fought an urge to toss him into the fire. She was convinced that his birth meant the death of her."

Saulnier says he shot footage that reveals the true nature of Medora and Vernon's relationship, but he ultimately decided it was better off left unspoken. However, the allusions are there. "Watch it again," he suggests. "There's actually lots of clues about Vernon and Medora in the movie."

So where should you pay especially close attention? "From the first time we meet Medora," he says. "It's the tour around Keelut. When she takes Core around, she says everything."

Indeed, when Medora is walking with Core, he asks her if she met her husband in the village. She responds, "I didn't meet him anywhere. I knew him my whole life. I don't have a memory he isn't in." Pretty telling, especially on a second watch.

"As far as Medora, we have people throughout the film chime [in] and analyze her, but it's never the correct answer," Saulnier says. "Core even explicitly says there is an answer, we just don't know it. That to me was more in keeping with the theme of the movie. When you spelled it out and tried to wrap it up in a bow at the end, it just lost its power."


While the mysteries of the characters' backgrounds and motivations contribute to the brooding tone of Hold the Dark, capturing the icy mood of the plot meant embracing the below freezing "terrible weather" in Alberta, Canada. It also meant working with real wolves. "I did not want to resort to CG wolves, 3D-built customized wolves that will do whatever you say, go wherever you want," Saulnier says. Yes, even during an early sequences wherein Core observes a pack tearing apart one of their young.

"The wolves behaved very well, but the makeup effects team had a huge task in that," he says. "Of course we had to keep things safe for everything -- the humans and the animals -- but that is a wolf pup designed by Mike Marino's team at Prosthetic Renaissance in New Jersey. Totally edible. Fabricated from scratch. With hair and skin. It was, like, insane. Brutal to watch, but totally integral to the theme of the whole story." After all, it's a brutal, disgusting world out there -- for humans and animals alive.